PDF_MAX --> option_3

This commit is contained in:
taipanromania 2008-07-18 14:42:08 +00:00
parent f44701be48
commit 244381770b
3 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -1435,7 +1435,7 @@ int cc_binary_string(struct zint_symbol *symbol, unsigned char source[], char bi
codewords_used += ecc_codewords; codewords_used += ecc_codewords;
codewords_used += 3; codewords_used += 3;
if(codewords_used > PDF_MAX) { if(codewords_used > symbol->option_3) {
return ERROR_TOO_LONG; return ERROR_TOO_LONG;
} }
/* *(cc_width) = 0.5 + sqrt((codewords_used) / 3); */ /* *(cc_width) = 0.5 + sqrt((codewords_used) / 3); */
@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ int cc_binary_string(struct zint_symbol *symbol, unsigned char source[], char bi
codewords_used += ecc_codewords; codewords_used += ecc_codewords;
codewords_used += 3; codewords_used += 3;
if(codewords_used > PDF_MAX) { if(codewords_used > symbol->option_3) {
return ERROR_TOO_LONG; return ERROR_TOO_LONG;
} }
/* *(cc_width) = 0.5 + sqrt((codewords_used) / 3); */ /* *(cc_width) = 0.5 + sqrt((codewords_used) / 3); */

View File

@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ int pdf417(struct zint_symbol *symbol, unsigned char chaine[])
only 2 check digits, so I have abandoned it! - Zint now insists on a proportional only 2 check digits, so I have abandoned it! - Zint now insists on a proportional
amount of check data unless overruled by the user */ amount of check data unless overruled by the user */
if(longueur + k > PDF_MAX) { if(longueur + k > symbol->option_3) {
return 2; return 2;
} }
if(((longueur + k) / symbol->option_2) > 90) { if(((longueur + k) / symbol->option_2) > 90) {

View File

@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
#define TEX 900 #define TEX 900
#define BYT 901 #define BYT 901
#define NUM 902 #define NUM 902
#define PDF_MAX 928
#define BRSET "ABCDEFabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz*+-" #define BRSET "ABCDEFabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz*+-"