Han Xin: Comment possible errors in AIMD-015

This commit is contained in:
Robin Stuart 2016-06-19 09:07:50 +01:00
parent 032dee1e0e
commit 55b33cfb88

View File

@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ void calculate_binary(char binary[], char mode[], int source[], int length) {
} }
if (debug) { if (debug) {
printf("0x%4X (%d)", encoding_value, encoding_value); printf("0x%4x (%d)", encoding_value, encoding_value);
} }
i += count; i += count;
@ -626,7 +626,8 @@ void calculate_binary(char binary[], char mode[], int source[], int length) {
} }
/* Terminator */ /* Terminator */
strcat(binary, "111111111111"); strcat(binary, "111111111111111");
/* Terminator sequence of length 12 is assumed to be a mistake */
if (debug) { if (debug) {
printf("\n"); printf("\n");
@ -1130,6 +1131,11 @@ int hx_evaluate(unsigned char *eval, int size, int pattern) {
} }
/* Test 2: Adjacent modules in row/column in same colour */ /* Test 2: Adjacent modules in row/column in same colour */
/* In AIMD-15 section 5.8.3.2 it is stated... “In Table 9 below, i refers to the row
* position of the module. - however i being the length of the run of the
* same colour (i.e. "block" below) in the same fashion as ISO/IEC 18004
* makes more sense. The implementation below matches AIMD-015.*/
/* Vertical */ /* Vertical */
for (x = 0; x < size; x++) { for (x = 0; x < size; x++) {
state = local[x]; state = local[x];