From 60a5d6db79631fe934701ab11b88628d9c267348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hooper114 Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 09:30:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove console output and add ECC comment --- backend/code1.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/backend/code1.c b/backend/code1.c index 47d823cc..53023ad8 100644 --- a/backend/code1.c +++ b/backend/code1.c @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ int c1_encode(struct zint_symbol *symbol, unsigned char source[], unsigned int t int text_buffer[6], text_p; int edi_buffer[6], edi_p; char decimal_binary[40]; - int byte_start; + int byte_start = 0; if(symbol->nullchar != 0x00) { for(i = 0; i < inputlen; i++) { @@ -1036,16 +1036,12 @@ int code_one(struct zint_symbol *symbol, unsigned char source[]) return ERROR_TOO_LONG; } - printf("len: %d\n", data_length); - for(i = 7; i >= 0; i--) { if(c1_data_length[i] >= data_length) { size = i + 1; } } - printf("size %d\n", size); - if(symbol->option_2 > size) { size = symbol->option_2; } @@ -1061,7 +1057,28 @@ int code_one(struct zint_symbol *symbol, unsigned char source[]) data_blocks = c1_blocks[size - 1]; - rs_init_gf(0x12D); + /* + Section 2.2.5.1 states: + "The polynomial arithmetic... is calculated using bit-wise modulo 2 arithmetic + and byte-wise modulo 100101101 arithmetic (this is a Galois Field of 2^8 with + 100101101 representing the field's prime modulus polynomial: + x^8 + x^5 + x^3 + x^2 + 1)." + This is the same as Data Matrix (ISO/IEC 16022) however the calculations in Appendix F + of the Code One specification do not agree with those in Annex E of ISO/IEC 16022. + For example Code One Appendix F states: + "The polynomial divisor for generating ten check characters for Version T-16 + and Version A is: + g(x)=x^10 + 136x^9 + 141x^8 + 113x^7 + 76x^6 + 218x^5 + 43x^4 + 85x^3 + + 182x^2 + 31x + 52." + Whereas ISO/IEC 16022 Annex E states: + "The polynomial divisor for generating 10 check characters is: + g(x)=x^10 + 61x^9 + 110x^8 + 255x^7 + 116x^6 + 248x^5 + 223x^4 + 166x^3 + + 185x^2 + 24x + 28." + For this code I have assumed that ISO/IEC 16022 is correct and the USS Code One + specifications are incorrect + */ + + rs_init_gf(0x12d); rs_init_code(c1_ecc_blocks[size - 1], 1); for(i = 0; i < data_blocks; i++) { for(j = 0; j < c1_data_blocks[size - 1]; j++) { @@ -1104,17 +1121,12 @@ int code_one(struct zint_symbol *symbol, unsigned char source[]) } } - for(i = 0; i < (c1_grid_height[size - 1] * 2); i++) { + /* for(i = 0; i < (c1_grid_height[size - 1] * 2); i++) { for(j = 0; j < (c1_grid_width[size - 1] * 4); j++) { printf("%c", datagrid[i][j]); } printf("\n"); - } - - for(i = 0; i < c1_ecc_length[size - 1] + data_length; i++) { - printf("%d ",stream[i]); - } - printf("\n"); + } */ symbol->rows = c1_height[size - 1]; symbol->width = c1_width[size - 1];